scaling: (all the hot toys from 2018.)
joker. ([personal profile] scaling) wrote2019-04-20 09:42 pm

( aefenglom inbox )




(  text  |  voice  |  video  |  action  )
grakraka: (ad hominem)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 06:29 am (UTC)(link)
[He raises his eyebrows, though he sips his coffee. Even Akira wouldn't spend time with him if he had other options but he doesn't point that out. The coffee provides a good way to keep his thoughts to himself.]

They need factual information to base their decisions on, though. [But he did notice Akira glossing over his own end.] Why don't you want to?
grakraka: (supersedeas)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 06:46 am (UTC)(link)
[Unfortunately, that makes him smile. The medicine must not be fixing everything if he still shows moments like that.]

Like when I irritate you. My apologies. That isn't a very good 'thank you'.
grakraka: (nunc pro tunc)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
[Moods, yes. Thoughts, on the other hand, might be different. He blinks at him, surprised.]

Ah? That's the part that irritated you?
grakraka: (communio bonorum)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 07:08 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm. [He frowns. They did talk about that. But he still hasn't found a reason to be here or anywhere else for that matter. Looking at himself, he can't see how a second chance isn't wasted on him in the first place. Well, there are a number of reasons it wouldn't work out anyway.] There is quite a lot of literature written about this subject, you know. For example, Aristotle posited that nothing is inherently good. No action has inherent goodness but rather a number of factors about yourself plays into what makes the action good or bad, not the outcome of said action.
grakraka: (erga omnes)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 07:39 am (UTC)(link)
Not because of the factors he outlined specifically. [But that murmured correction doesn't explain his own feelings very well.] What do you think then? I'm curious. I don't know too much about your views on these matters.
grakraka: (de minimis)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 08:09 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if everyone is capable of good. [Most people he has met throughout his life wouldn't qualify for that.] But I actually do agree that bad factors don't exclude the ability to do good or cancel out anything good they do. It really depends on the situation. Still, it's something important to humans, which is why so many philosophers have tried to come up with a system that can create a good person, or at least their version of a good person. Morals and ethics play into that, of course, but even so, everyone tries to figure out what would be the 'right' thing to do at some point.
grakraka: (ad colligenda bona)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
[He gives an encouraging nod as he lowers his cup from his lips, smiling.] That would be similar to absurdist theory. The universe is chaotic and meaningless and yet we search for meaning, for purpose, for absolutes that cannot ever be given. Probably, anyway. It's a perfectly valid philosophy to subscribe to.

"Thus I draw from the absurd three consequences, which are my revolt, my freedom, and my passion. By the mere activity of consciousness I transform into a rule of life what was an invitation to death, and I refuse suicide." [He laughs softly.] That would be Camus, a rather famous absurdist. To exist is an act of rebellion in a universe that denies you significance and meaning.
grakraka: (crimen falsi)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 08:49 am (UTC)(link)
I thought you might like it. I think it suits you. [He hesitates before making a decision and continuing.] Hegelian philosophy is characterized by the dichotomy of master and slave, of you and the other. I'm oversimplifying it, of course. The problem with Hegelian philosophy is that you could read several different volumes and still not have made much of a dent.

[Akechi drums his fingers on his mug.] But in essence, there is you and the other. By seeing the other, you come to recognise yourself. Your strengths but also your weaknesses. Your flaws. And in the other, you see the strengths and weaknesses. It creates an instability in your world that you, naturally, try to correct. You try to come out on top and dominate the other. However, that way leads to ruin, because it isn't domination anyone really wants. It's recognition. It's equality. No one who solely dominates finds it fulfilling or rewarding. They must continue to do it, again and again, and it will never be enough. It will never give them what they need for their true satisfaction.

[How many rich people are content with their riches? How many politicians are content with their power? No one who builds their lives on domination has been satisfied with that life, as far as he has seen. They only devour more around them.]

Basically, we live in a world of interactions and we desire something from those interactions. We have a self that needs to be met by the selves of others. I find it interesting.
grakraka: (validior praesumptionem)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 09:24 am (UTC)(link)
[A light comes to his eyes as he gives a soft laugh. Out of everything, he didn't expect him to remember something he said to try to impress him. At the time, he'd be certain that had been a 'miss'. But Akira remembers after all. A warmth builds in his chest and he feels annoyed and delighted at once.]

You remember that. I didn't know if you would or not. Yes, it's about self-recognition and someone outside of you validating that self. Mind you, Hegel hated that people reduced these views to such simplistic versions of themselves, because he knew interactions with the world are not at all neat or simple. There is no ideal in this world but rather incomplete, struggling viewpoints throwing themselves against each other in explosive and messy clashes. Sometimes those merge into something greater than the parts. But not often.
grakraka: (persona non grata)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-18 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
[Another surprise. Akechi sips his coffee, eyes shut as he considers it. Akira did help him see it. He saw the kind of hero he had wanted to be in the other boy, the kind of person he had once thought maybe he could be someday in general. He saw someone he didn't understand and he can't say he reacted well to it, either, but that too was part of himself. All the things Akira makes him think and feel are parts of himself, for better or worse.

He offers soft words as he swirls the coffee in the mug.]


I'd like it if I did the same someday.
grakraka: (facio ut facias)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-19 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
[Since he can't even begin to process the idea that he has affected Akira so deeply, he instead takes the out provided and teases him.]

Isn't the wine still here?
grakraka: (corpus juris gentium)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-19 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
[He snorts and grins over his cup.]

If everyone who should not drink abstained, there would be very few drinkers at all.
grakraka: (pro bono publico)

[personal profile] grakraka 2019-06-19 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
[It shouldn't be so funny but he gives a short laugh as he shakes his head.] Ah, hey. I'm a model student. You can't call me a bad influence. If it's my suggestion, it must be a good one.

(no subject)

[personal profile] grakraka - 2019-06-19 04:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] grakraka - 2019-06-19 04:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] grakraka - 2019-06-19 05:21 (UTC) - Expand